seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

The main target is about the intention to cause injury. This is actually a major issue: an especially low threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.

In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment over the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that whilst the crime of murder was recognized, the offender experienced a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case set a precedent for thinking about mitigating factors during sentencing.

To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal suggestions or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed on the court in which the case has long been or will be filed.

These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—is definitely the principle by which judges are bound to these types of past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.

The recent amendment to Section 489-F with the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the legislation with contemporary challenges.

Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there may be a single or more judgments given (or reported). Only the reason for that decision from the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could possibly be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may be adopted in an argument.

whether even though granting promotion senior employees were viewed as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)

Commonly, only an appeal accepted via the court of final resort will resolve these kinds of differences and, For most reasons, these appeals tend to be not granted.

Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

How much sway case regulation holds could change by jurisdiction, read more and by the exact circumstances in the current case. To discover this concept, consider the following case law definition.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of the laws, the legal system adheres to your doctrine of stare decisis

The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and probable hazard to local residents. Eventually, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, whilst observing the general development supports that electromagnetic fields have adverse effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should adopt the precautionary principle established out while in the 1992 Rio Declaration around the Environment and Development, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The dearth of full scientific certainty should not be used like a reason to prevent environmental degradation.